URJCMUN NEWS CENTRE
  • PORTADA
  • URJCmun X Edición
    • COMITÉS EN ESPAÑOL >
      • FAO
      • SPECPOL
      • OIEA
      • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
      • CTC
      • DISEC
      • ECOFIN
      • SOCHUM
      • OMS
      • ONU HÁBITAT
      • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
      • ECOSOC
      • ONU MUJERES
      • UNICEF
      • UNODC
    • ENGLISH COMITTEES >
      • UNHCR
      • UNDP
      • HRC
      • UNESCO
      • UNDRR
  • URJCmun TEEN 2022
    • UNDP 2022
    • UNESCO 2022
    • UNODC 2022
    • ONU HABITAT 2022
    • ECOSOC 2022
    • FAO 2022
    • SOCHUM 1 2022
    • UNHCR 2022
    • SOCHUM 2 2022
  • HEMEROTECA
    • URJCmunTEEN 2021
    • URJCmun >
      • URJCmun 2021 >
        • ENGLISH COMITEES >
          • SOCHUM
          • UNWOMEN
          • UNHCR
          • DISEC
          • --
        • COMITÉS EN ESPAÑOL
        • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
        • CDH 2
        • CDH 1
        • PNUD
        • ECOFIN
        • ECOSOC
        • ONU HÁBITAT
        • PNUMA
        • SPECPOL >
          • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
        • UNICEF
        • UNODC 1
        • UNODC 2
        • ECOSOC
        • UNOOSA
        • UNHCR
        • PNUMA
        • UNOOSA
        • UNICEF
      • URJCmun 2020 >
        • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
          • DISEC
          • ECOFIN
          • ECOSOC
          • C. JURÍDICA
          • UNDP
          • ONU Mujeres
          • SPECPOL
          • UNICEF
          • CNUCYD
          • C. SEGURIDAD
          • UNODC
          • UNESCO
        • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
          • DISEC
          • WHO
          • SOCHUM
          • HRC
          • UNHCR
      • URJCmun 2019 >
        • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
          • DISEC
          • ECOFIN
          • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
          • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
          • OIEA
          • PNUMA
          • UNODC
          • PMA
          • CSTD
        • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
          • SOCHUM
          • UN WOMEN
          • UNDP
          • HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
          • UNICEF
      • URJCMUN 2018 >
        • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
          • ECOFIN
          • SOCHUM
          • C. JURÍDICA
          • UNODC
          • C. SEGURIDAD
          • ONU MUJERES
          • ECOSOC
          • PNUD
        • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
          • DISEC
          • SPECPOL
          • HUMAN RIGHTS
          • SECURITY COUNCIL
          • UNICEF
      • URJCMUN 2016 >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
        • AG >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • CSH >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • DISEC >
          • CHRONICLES
          • VIDEO
        • HRC >
          • CHRONICLES
          • VIDEO
        • ONUMujeres >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • SOCHUM >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • UNHCR >
          • CHRONICLES
          • VIDEO
      • URJCMUN 2015 >
        • CSH
        • DISEC
        • SOCHUM
        • UNDP
      • URJCMUN 2014 >
        • ECOSOC
        • HRC >
          • COMITÉS EN ESPAÑOL >
            • ECOFIN
            • SOCHUM
            • SPECPOL
            • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
            • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
            • UNODC
            • UNICEF
            • ONU MUJERES
            • ECOSOC
            • ONU HABITAT
            • OMS
            • OIEA
    • URJCmun TEEN >
      • URJCmunTEEN 2020
Miércoles 9 de marzo del 2022

UNESCO

Adriana Rodríguez 
UNESCO DÍA 1
Comienza el primer día de simulaciones estudiantiles en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de

Móstoles. A las 10.30 de la mañana, tras el reparto de acreditaciones, los distintos

representantes de los 30 países de todo el mundo que han decidido participar en estas

jornadas de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura

(UNESCO) pudieron asistir a la ceremonia de apertura y, posteriormente, tras el
coffee break,

tuvieron lugar las conferencias de los distintos comités, lo cual supuso el adentrarse de

lleno en el proyecto URJCmun Teen. 



Tras la comida, fueron primero las presentaciones de un minuto y medio de cada territorio y,

a continuación, las mociones relacionadas con el tema central del día: la globalización y su

relación con la economía. Sin duda, después de esta primera parte de la sesión 0 el debate

parecía prometedor dada la distancia de culturas y religiones en una misma sala.



La primera moción que salió adelante por mayoría absoluta trataba la importancia de

preservar las culturas. Durante 10 minutos pudieron intervenir Francia, Canadá, Perú, Italia,

Vatican City, United Arab Emirates, Siria, Peru, USA, China, Austria, Afganistán, Alemania,

Hungría, Holanda y Egipto, que generalmente tratan desde temas como avances en la

ciencia y tecnológicos, economía, así como aspectos más ligados a cada país como sus

lenguas, costumbres, muchos de ellos haciendo referencia a sus habitantes, historia y

cultura.



Tras esto, el representante de Perú realizó una moción con aires más optimistas que el resto.

Dicha moción, en la que se proponía discutir en 15 minutos sobre los posibles efectos

positivos de la globalización, terminó por salir adelante. Emiratos Árabes Unidos, que tomó

la palabra en numerosas ocasiones, China, Canadá, India, Francia quisieron dar su punto de

vista respecto a este asunto. Los temas principales que salieron a la luz fueron poner en el

centro la vida de las personas, promoviendo así la paz en el conjunto del mundo, punto en

que la mayoría de representantes estuvieron de acuerdo, al igual que al hablar de fomentar

el respeto entre culturas y religiones, o cuestiones como luchar en conjunto contra el

cambio climático.



Llegados a este punto, la siguiente cuestión fue cómo asegurar la existencia de las culturas.

Aquí el debate se enfocó en la peligrosidad de que las culturas más minoritarias

desaparezcan en un mundo más globalizado. En esta ocasión países como Italia, Marruecos,

China e India aportaron medidas concretas para paliar este posible problema de la

globalización.



A continuación, tras un descanso informal de media hora, se cerró el día procediendo a

hacer un feedback en que cada uno de los participantes pudo plantear a las 
faculty

advisors
sus dudas, visiones sobre el día y comenzar a pensar enmiendas, plantear puntos a

favor y en contra con el resto de países, etc. de cara a negociar y poder llegar a redactar una

resolución. Llegados a las 18.30 se cerró la sesión y los participantes pudieron abandonar la

​sala hasta mañana a las 10.00, cuando se encontrarán en el aula 002 del aulario III. 


Picture
Thursday, March 10th 2022

UNESCO

​Adriana Rodríguez

Second day of URJCmun at UNESCO: the draft resolutions begin
The second day of simulations of the Model United Nations begins at the Rey Juan Carlos

University in Móstoles. At 10 a.m., representatives of the 30 countries participating in the

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) attended the first

session in which the main topics were related to globalization in general terms. Once the first

debates had taken place, a round of table discussion took place in which all delegations

were held accountable to each other and two camps, for and against globalisation, began to

emerge.


Still, despite the absence of concrete measures, the day looked promising for the time being.

After the coffee break, the first motion to go forward in session III was put to the vote. After

four of them had been rejected, Germany warned of the importance of talking about the

economy, which France supported. Finally, the fifth motion, "Solutions for globalisation",

proposed by the delegation of the Republic of Peru, was carried. Syria, France, India, Egypt

and Germany, among others, offered their views. 


At this point, the dilemma was whether the discussion on the drafting of the resolution would

take place in the framework of an unmoderated caucus, as proposed by Israel, or a

moderated caucus. Peru and India then entered into a "race" over who would be the

moderator, as while the former proposed a 9-minute debate, Peru proposed 9 minutes and

10 seconds, bringing a smile to more than one person's face with humorous comments such

as "who gives more?" The morning session concluded with the unmoderated caucus

proposed by the delegate from Israel, followed by another proposed by Peru. 


The lunch break was unanimously agreed and delegates did not reconvene until 14.15, when

the afternoon session began. The first activity of the afternoon was a new round table, in this

case multiple countries of the Unesco Committee showed their concerns, as well as

concrete solutions, to problems related to tourism, education, as was the case of Peru and

Germany, culture and other issues that arise during the process of globalisation. 


At around 4 p.m., the Indian delegate asked for a moderated caucus in order to generate

agreements and to begin drafting the first draft resolutions, of which there were two so far.

No one wanted to object, and so the caucus proceeded. There were three clearly

differentiated groups in the room.


On this second day, the photograph of all participants would be taken at 18.00, after which it

had to be decided which would be the last activity. The group of representatives decided to

give way, on two more occasions, to two consecutive unmoderated caucuses of 15 minutes,

which served to confirm two draft resolutions in which the protagonists seemed to be India

​and Peru. 
Picture


Thursday, 11th March 2022

UNESCO

Adriana Rodríguez
Last day of URJCmun at UNESCO: end of resolutions, casts and prizes
Third and last day of UN simulations at the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Móstoles. At

10.20 a.m. the morning session was officially opened after the viewing of the video of

yesterday's session and the reading of the chronicle. The agenda consisted of closing

resolutions and voting on amendments. 


The first activity of the day consisted of a round table where representatives from countries

such as Peru, India, Germany and Vatican City spoke. In view of today's vote on amendments

and resolutions, there was a clear intention to convince the rest of the delegates.


After the coffee break, the formal session was reopened and a 5-minute unmoderated

caucus was requested to finalise the resolutions and to give way to proposals for tabling the

resolutions. At this point, the room was divided into two, the side seated on the left, which

was the first to present, and the side on the right, which presented afterwards.


The camp on the right grouped the countries of Greece, India, Israel and Germany, among

others, and their document was based on measures to promote minority cultures, financing

them through the creation of a common fund in which economically stable countries

contribute 1% of GDP. In addition, they insisted on investing in education to maintain culture

from generation to generation and promoting tourism through financial support for travel

agencies. 


The group on the right, with Peru, Austria, China, the United States and the United Arab

Emirates as promoters, then proposed a series of measures that put minority cultures at the

centre, such as indigenous crafts, events, a building as a monument representing all

cultures, large investments in education or a fund made up mainly of China and the USA, the

richest countries, to make all these measures possible in all countries.


Then came the creation and voting on amendments, where the attendees could add, delete

or modify different issues in the draft resolutions. Delegates held a final 15-minute debate on

the draft resolutions. 


Lunchtime was the time for drafting and submitting amendments. The first was from Vatican

City, supported by India as second mover, which proposed an amendment to modify the

culture clause of the second. Other amendments were tabled but, with the exception of one,

all were adopted amicably and the resolution adopted was that of the group on the right.


The last day ended in the most amusing way with punishments, where not even the chairs

were spared from just dancing, prizes for the most outstanding delegates such as those of

the United Arab Emirates and Peru and many romances after the reading of gossips.

​

Con tecnología de Crea tu propio sitio web con las plantillas personalizables.
  • PORTADA
  • URJCmun X Edición
    • COMITÉS EN ESPAÑOL >
      • FAO
      • SPECPOL
      • OIEA
      • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
      • CTC
      • DISEC
      • ECOFIN
      • SOCHUM
      • OMS
      • ONU HÁBITAT
      • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
      • ECOSOC
      • ONU MUJERES
      • UNICEF
      • UNODC
    • ENGLISH COMITTEES >
      • UNHCR
      • UNDP
      • HRC
      • UNESCO
      • UNDRR
  • URJCmun TEEN 2022
    • UNDP 2022
    • UNESCO 2022
    • UNODC 2022
    • ONU HABITAT 2022
    • ECOSOC 2022
    • FAO 2022
    • SOCHUM 1 2022
    • UNHCR 2022
    • SOCHUM 2 2022
  • HEMEROTECA
    • URJCmunTEEN 2021
    • URJCmun >
      • URJCmun 2021 >
        • ENGLISH COMITEES >
          • SOCHUM
          • UNWOMEN
          • UNHCR
          • DISEC
          • --
        • COMITÉS EN ESPAÑOL
        • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
        • CDH 2
        • CDH 1
        • PNUD
        • ECOFIN
        • ECOSOC
        • ONU HÁBITAT
        • PNUMA
        • SPECPOL >
          • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
        • UNICEF
        • UNODC 1
        • UNODC 2
        • ECOSOC
        • UNOOSA
        • UNHCR
        • PNUMA
        • UNOOSA
        • UNICEF
      • URJCmun 2020 >
        • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
          • DISEC
          • ECOFIN
          • ECOSOC
          • C. JURÍDICA
          • UNDP
          • ONU Mujeres
          • SPECPOL
          • UNICEF
          • CNUCYD
          • C. SEGURIDAD
          • UNODC
          • UNESCO
        • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
          • DISEC
          • WHO
          • SOCHUM
          • HRC
          • UNHCR
      • URJCmun 2019 >
        • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
          • DISEC
          • ECOFIN
          • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
          • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
          • OIEA
          • PNUMA
          • UNODC
          • PMA
          • CSTD
        • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
          • SOCHUM
          • UN WOMEN
          • UNDP
          • HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
          • UNICEF
      • URJCMUN 2018 >
        • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
          • ECOFIN
          • SOCHUM
          • C. JURÍDICA
          • UNODC
          • C. SEGURIDAD
          • ONU MUJERES
          • ECOSOC
          • PNUD
        • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
          • DISEC
          • SPECPOL
          • HUMAN RIGHTS
          • SECURITY COUNCIL
          • UNICEF
      • URJCMUN 2016 >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
        • AG >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • CSH >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • DISEC >
          • CHRONICLES
          • VIDEO
        • HRC >
          • CHRONICLES
          • VIDEO
        • ONUMujeres >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • SOCHUM >
          • CRÓNICAS
          • VÍDEO
        • UNHCR >
          • CHRONICLES
          • VIDEO
      • URJCMUN 2015 >
        • CSH
        • DISEC
        • SOCHUM
        • UNDP
      • URJCMUN 2014 >
        • ECOSOC
        • HRC >
          • COMITÉS EN ESPAÑOL >
            • ECOFIN
            • SOCHUM
            • SPECPOL
            • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
            • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
            • UNODC
            • UNICEF
            • ONU MUJERES
            • ECOSOC
            • ONU HABITAT
            • OMS
            • OIEA
    • URJCmun TEEN >
      • URJCmunTEEN 2020