The countdown to the end of the meeting is here
There is no place for tiredness
4 febrero 2022
|
There were only a few hours left before UNDP closed its doors again. Four days of intense work come to an end without any international plan to support the current needs of the world's population. Despite this, it is not daring to speculate about the possible start-up of any of the projects that the countries have presented in their motions.
The morning has been complicated because the delegations wanted to continue debating. Nonetheless, there was not time enough to present any resolution on the second headline for which the committee was responsible. For this reason, it is even more heartbreaking that yesterday the resolution most supported by the signatories was not approved. At least today most have appeared in the room. Nations have been opened to listening to other proposals. Chile began the session addressing the issue of infrastructure designed for transportation and how to implement improvements. Finland recovered the vision that it could not develop during yesterday's session due to lack of time and insists on the importance of reinventing recycling. Towards the end of the session, the governments of Argentina, Mexico, South Africa and Colombia filed an official complaint because of the lack distribution of COVID-19 vaccines due to unfair international agreements. They were suffering from this situation for the last weeks and demanded a solution. This crisis tested international solidarity and the solidity of the coalitions created up to that moment. Some countries, such as Belize, advocated controlled and adequate aid. However, others, including Malta, Israel and Russia, were more hesitant and conveyed to the group of delegations their concern about what wrong management could cause: economic losses and political disaster. Therefore, it only remains to wait for the dates of the next meetings. Delegations must reach an agreement for the security and stability of the countries. In any case, all the actions that have been born in these four days will be closely followed. |
Gema Mañogil
|
Third round
UNDP has not reached an agreement on
anti-poverty measures
No proposal has been approved by the present delegations.
3 febrero 2022
Today, the delegations had the opportunity to launch a cosmopolitan plan to solve the serious problems that surround poverty. At first sight, it seemed that an economic reform was going to be possible, but it has proven unreachable.
For the surprise of all attendees, neither of the two resolutions presented by their coalitions has been approved. Initially, both addressed many of the topics that had concerned most countries in their motions. In fact, the absence of several delegates is the reason for not having approved any resolution.
The proposal from Belize, Israel, DPRK, Russia and Colombia would probably have been approved due to the large number of signatories it got. They wanted to develop education on the green sector depending on the capacity of each country to improve infrastructures. Their main objective is to create new jobs and innovate in new industries like green energies, keeping rural areas in mind.
It has been a passioned time. Both coalitions have strongly defended their options and they had some points in common. The crux of the matter is the lack of responsibility of some delegates who have abandoned the debate. Doubtless, there could have been a deal.
After the failure related to the first issue the UNDP had to deal with, the delegations have faced the following question that they had to debate. It was now time for Urban metabolism and smart resource management.
South Korea, Sudan, Germany and Norway have eagerly started the second headline of the debate. Finland, Kuwait, Canada and Ukraine were quick to join the dialogue. Some of the ideas for motions have been organization of cities, definition of circular economy, plastic recycling and renewable sources of energy.
All in all, there is still hope and it is hoped that the UNDP will be able to draw conclusions that will lead to real solutions. In other words, delegations must remember that the welfare of their citizens is on their hands.
For the surprise of all attendees, neither of the two resolutions presented by their coalitions has been approved. Initially, both addressed many of the topics that had concerned most countries in their motions. In fact, the absence of several delegates is the reason for not having approved any resolution.
The proposal from Belize, Israel, DPRK, Russia and Colombia would probably have been approved due to the large number of signatories it got. They wanted to develop education on the green sector depending on the capacity of each country to improve infrastructures. Their main objective is to create new jobs and innovate in new industries like green energies, keeping rural areas in mind.
It has been a passioned time. Both coalitions have strongly defended their options and they had some points in common. The crux of the matter is the lack of responsibility of some delegates who have abandoned the debate. Doubtless, there could have been a deal.
After the failure related to the first issue the UNDP had to deal with, the delegations have faced the following question that they had to debate. It was now time for Urban metabolism and smart resource management.
South Korea, Sudan, Germany and Norway have eagerly started the second headline of the debate. Finland, Kuwait, Canada and Ukraine were quick to join the dialogue. Some of the ideas for motions have been organization of cities, definition of circular economy, plastic recycling and renewable sources of energy.
All in all, there is still hope and it is hoped that the UNDP will be able to draw conclusions that will lead to real solutions. In other words, delegations must remember that the welfare of their citizens is on their hands.
Realistic proposals lead to fair realities
UNDP walks towards effective solutions to eradicate poverty
Nations begin to focus on clear and defined goal
2 de febrero 2022
The second day at URJC United Nations model has started off strong. All the countries seem impatient to address the issues left pending during the first sessions.
Honestly, participation has been overwhelming today. The different projects proposed by many delegations in search of eradicating poverty have been main characters. Some countries have been encouraged for the first time to defend an idea that could work according to their points of view.
The first agreements and international collaborations have also been seen. One way or another, countries have spoken about how governments can offer help because it is significant for all countries, especially Switzerland, Italy and France.
Egypt, Malta and Canada have discussed economic reforms while Australia and Belize have spoken about the importance of a firm base on which solid goals could be built. This position is shared by other nations that have been open to international collaboration, including the called BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
For its part, South Africa has continued focusing on reducing the gap that exists between different nations as it is crucial for achieving international well-being. These issues are related to policies focused on education and employment to eradicate poverty. The main reason is that these are two necessary areas in the daily life of citizens that cannot be suppressed in any case.
The day ended with reflections on the guiding points mentioned during the sessions. Finally, two large international unions have been created that seem consistent. Now they have the obligation to put aside their differences and seek a common good in accordance with the interests of their respective countries.
URJCmun is forcing nations to reach an agreement about the unequal development that exists in the world. And there is hope that an official resolution project will be achieved tomorrow. Not only to guarantee human rights, but because diplomacy is the only way left for humanity to ensure stability and dignity for all human beings. Regardless of where they are, their gender or their ideology.
Honestly, participation has been overwhelming today. The different projects proposed by many delegations in search of eradicating poverty have been main characters. Some countries have been encouraged for the first time to defend an idea that could work according to their points of view.
The first agreements and international collaborations have also been seen. One way or another, countries have spoken about how governments can offer help because it is significant for all countries, especially Switzerland, Italy and France.
Egypt, Malta and Canada have discussed economic reforms while Australia and Belize have spoken about the importance of a firm base on which solid goals could be built. This position is shared by other nations that have been open to international collaboration, including the called BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
For its part, South Africa has continued focusing on reducing the gap that exists between different nations as it is crucial for achieving international well-being. These issues are related to policies focused on education and employment to eradicate poverty. The main reason is that these are two necessary areas in the daily life of citizens that cannot be suppressed in any case.
The day ended with reflections on the guiding points mentioned during the sessions. Finally, two large international unions have been created that seem consistent. Now they have the obligation to put aside their differences and seek a common good in accordance with the interests of their respective countries.
URJCmun is forcing nations to reach an agreement about the unequal development that exists in the world. And there is hope that an official resolution project will be achieved tomorrow. Not only to guarantee human rights, but because diplomacy is the only way left for humanity to ensure stability and dignity for all human beings. Regardless of where they are, their gender or their ideology.
A multidirectional beginning
Poverty in the international spotlight
Tireless and intensive negotiations in which all nations have something to say
1 de febrero 2022
The United Nations Development Programme reopens its doors during a difficult time due to the recent health crisis caused by COVID-19. Countries have much to say about the circumstances that prevent their policies and actions from developing.
Among the most complicated tasks that delegates are facing this time are the definition of “poverty”, the types that exist and how they can affect the conditions of each economy and culture. Despite the difficulty, the atmosphere has breathed responsibility, ideas, desire and a lot of concern.
It is clear that poverty is an issue that matters to all nations. However, it is possible to see the problem from many points of view. Especially, it is crucial to take into account the social, political, economic and cultural context that surrounds the regions when making a decision about the most appropriate measures in each part of the world. South Africa insists: “our solutions must be locally driven and tailored to the specific needs of people”.
Another key point that has been discussed during today's debate is the need of making effective the measures that ensure the security and freedom of citizens, as well as the fight against poverty. Several nations have been genuinely alarmed by the lack of reality that goes hand in hand with empty proposals that are not at all realistic.
There is widespread anger that forces the nations involved to demand real solutions. Some countries, such as Australia and Malta, stand out for proposing financial policies modifications as an essential project. But there is agreement on the importance of education and security. In this sense, Canada insists that poverty conditions limits people's freedom. This would be a violation of article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Social factors have been also addressed when delegates have explored the circumstances surrounding the issue of lack of resources and unmet needs. Belize mentions migration and birth rates as factors to consider before making any decision.
There is no doubt that the dialogue has only just begun. Chile and Japan call for collaboration and the rest of the countries are announced to continue debating to find a realistic solution adapted to the needs of each nation.
Among the most complicated tasks that delegates are facing this time are the definition of “poverty”, the types that exist and how they can affect the conditions of each economy and culture. Despite the difficulty, the atmosphere has breathed responsibility, ideas, desire and a lot of concern.
It is clear that poverty is an issue that matters to all nations. However, it is possible to see the problem from many points of view. Especially, it is crucial to take into account the social, political, economic and cultural context that surrounds the regions when making a decision about the most appropriate measures in each part of the world. South Africa insists: “our solutions must be locally driven and tailored to the specific needs of people”.
Another key point that has been discussed during today's debate is the need of making effective the measures that ensure the security and freedom of citizens, as well as the fight against poverty. Several nations have been genuinely alarmed by the lack of reality that goes hand in hand with empty proposals that are not at all realistic.
There is widespread anger that forces the nations involved to demand real solutions. Some countries, such as Australia and Malta, stand out for proposing financial policies modifications as an essential project. But there is agreement on the importance of education and security. In this sense, Canada insists that poverty conditions limits people's freedom. This would be a violation of article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Social factors have been also addressed when delegates have explored the circumstances surrounding the issue of lack of resources and unmet needs. Belize mentions migration and birth rates as factors to consider before making any decision.
There is no doubt that the dialogue has only just begun. Chile and Japan call for collaboration and the rest of the countries are announced to continue debating to find a realistic solution adapted to the needs of each nation.
