URJCMUN NEWS CENTRE
  • PORTADA
  • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL
    • DISEC
    • ECOFIN
    • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
    • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
    • OIEA
    • PNUMA
    • UNODC
    • PMA
    • CSTD
  • ENGLISH COMMITTEES
    • SOCHUM
    • UN WOMEN
    • UNDP
    • HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
    • UNICEF
  • HEMEROTECA
    • URJCMUN 2018 >
      • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
        • ECOFIN
        • SOCHUM
        • C. JURÍDICA
        • UNODC
        • C. SEGURIDAD
        • ONU MUJERES
        • ECOSOC
        • PNUD
      • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
        • DISEC
        • SPECPOL
        • HUMAN RIGHTS
        • SECURITY COUNCIL
        • UNICEF
    • URJCMUN 2016 >
      • CHRONICLES
      • VIDEO
      • AG >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • CSH >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • DISEC >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
      • HRC >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
      • ONUMujeres >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • SOCHUM >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • UNHCR >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
    • URJCMUN 2015 >
      • CSH
      • DISEC
      • SOCHUM
      • UNDP
    • URJCMUN 2014 >
      • ECOSOC
      • HRC

DISEC

USA, eager to press the red button

2/7/2018

0 Comentarios

 
Imagen
Imagen | Daniel Martínez
Although the session began with the US in the spotlight, as the aches and reproaches advanced, the model wobbled mainly motivated by the response of the US that threatened to use its nuclear weapons, encouraging the end of the model for being a diplomatic conflict as well as ending the existence of countries like Brazil or Iran.

Also it's worth say the disappearances of folders and with it the possible transmission of unauthorized information (what motivates the USA to be more irritable in the debate).

Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and the USA were the protagonists of this new convocation in which the attacks and infirmities predominated in front of possible agreements and resolutions of peace also joined the debate brazil being an essential part of today's resolution.

The topic to be discussed would focus on the disarment based on proportionality, being aware of an impossible withdrawal of weapons in the entire world but in a proportional reduction of it.

USA want to focus the issue on the necessity for armament against the power of Russia also claimined countries of the middle east that they should not have cause for complaint since they had not been attacked (yet).

Pakistan by allusions responded by referring what in the previous session US argued (the promotion and innovation of weapons) in the face of today's position based on cooperation and progressive reduction to find peace.

The debate began to be more tense when in the middle of the session the folder with all the relevant information for the USA disappeared.

Countries like the USA Russia and China wanted to get Israel to position and argue in favor of them, while Middle Eastern countries continued to refer to the issue that has brought them together in this debate as it is the end of a war and with it the end of the insecurities as South Africa held.

“The first step to achieve this is to start in the Middle East” a phrase that prompted discussion in the debate between powers like USA and Russia against Iran, which had supporters such as Arabia, who gave their voice for the first time in this new sesión:”this way is not the correct”.

The session tensed as the moment that US and Russia launched different threats to countries such as Iran or Brazil, being defenseless in the absence of nuclear weapons.

While they will seek dialogue with countries like Israel, a diplomatic conflict that threatened Brazil as well as the model and committee began with the phrase "remember that we have nuclear weapons and others do not."

With this phrase the model was put to an end with the delegates being aware of the consequences that this threat would have for subsequent sessions, leaving in the air a possible unstoppable conflict.

In conclusion, the debate continues without reaching any common agreement, since delegates are more interested in inciting conflict than in dialogue.
0 Comentarios



Deja una respuesta.

    Celia Amayuelas

    DISEC CHRONICLER

    Archivos

    Febrero 2018

    Categorías

    Todos

    Fuente RSS

Con tecnología de Crea tu propio sitio web único con plantillas personalizables.
  • PORTADA
  • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL
    • DISEC
    • ECOFIN
    • COMISIÓN JURÍDICA
    • CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD
    • OIEA
    • PNUMA
    • UNODC
    • PMA
    • CSTD
  • ENGLISH COMMITTEES
    • SOCHUM
    • UN WOMEN
    • UNDP
    • HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
    • UNICEF
  • HEMEROTECA
    • URJCMUN 2018 >
      • COMITÉS ESPAÑOL >
        • ECOFIN
        • SOCHUM
        • C. JURÍDICA
        • UNODC
        • C. SEGURIDAD
        • ONU MUJERES
        • ECOSOC
        • PNUD
      • ENGLISH COMMITTEES >
        • DISEC
        • SPECPOL
        • HUMAN RIGHTS
        • SECURITY COUNCIL
        • UNICEF
    • URJCMUN 2016 >
      • CHRONICLES
      • VIDEO
      • AG >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • CSH >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • DISEC >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
      • HRC >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
      • ONUMujeres >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • SOCHUM >
        • CRÓNICAS
        • VÍDEO
      • UNHCR >
        • CHRONICLES
        • VIDEO
    • URJCMUN 2015 >
      • CSH
      • DISEC
      • SOCHUM
      • UNDP
    • URJCMUN 2014 >
      • ECOSOC
      • HRC